%图
\begin{figure}[H] 
\centering
\includegraphics[width=12cm]{flowchartmodel1.png}
\caption{} 
\label{}
\end{figure}

%表

\begin{table}[H]\small
  \centering
  \caption{Truncation Correction for Key High-Demand Sites}
  \label{tab:truncation_correction}
  \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
    \toprule
    Site Name & $\mu$ & $p_{trunc}$&$\tilde{\mu}$ & Correction Magnitude \\
    \midrule
    MFP Waverly & 396.6 & 81.57\% & 429.0 & +8.2\% \\
    MFP Avoca & 314.6 & 26.84\% & 323.0 & +2.7\% \\
    MFP Endwell United Methodist & 285.3 & 14.34\% & 289.3 & +1.4\% \\
    MFP College TC3 - College & 261.5 & 16.80\% & 265.9 & +1.7\% \\
    MFP Redeemer Lutheran Church & 230.6 & 10.07\% & 232.9 & +1.0\% \\
    \bottomrule
  \end{tabular}
\end{table}

%有颜色的表


\begin{table}[H]
  \small
  \centering
  \caption{Performance Comparison of Different Allocation Schemes }
  \label{tab:allocation_performance}
  % 缩放至单栏宽度，保留1em内边距避免贴边
  \resizebox{\dimexpr\linewidth-1em\relax}{!}{
    \begin{tabular}{lllll}
      \toprule[1pt] % 加粗顶线
      \rowcolor{white} % 表头底色为白
      Allocation Scheme & E1 & E2& F1$\downarrow$ & F2 $\uparrow$\\
      \midrule[0.6pt]
      \rowcolor{recommendColor} % 推荐方案浅蓝底色
      Recommended Scheme ($\tilde{\mu}$ Proportional) & 139,469 & 131,462 & 0.314 & 2.00 \\
      \rowcolor{baselineColor} % 基线方案浅灰底色
      Baseline 1: Uniform Allocation & 104,797 & 101,309 & 0.024 & 9.25 \\
      \rowcolor{baselineColor}
      Baseline 2: 2019 Historical Scaling & 104,071 & 100,264 & 0.091 & 5.00 \\
      \rowcolor{baselineColor}
      Baseline 3: Raw Demand Proportion (Raw $\mu$) & 139,129 & 131,397 & 0.313 & 2.00 \\
      \bottomrule[1pt] % 加粗底线
    \end{tabular}
  }
\end{table}

%点

\begin{itemize}
    \item \textbf{Survivorship Bias in Observed Data}: The table and Figure \ref{Truncation Correction for High-Demand Sites} reveal "survivorship bias" in observed data. For MFP Waverly, its 81.57\% truncation probability means the site operated nearly permanently at full capacity historically—its observed mean reflects capacity limits, not the ceiling of true demand.
    \item \textbf{Significance of Correction}: Via the truncated normal model, the site’s potential demand is adjusted upward to 429.0. This ensures resource allocation is based on "actual community needs" , resolving the underestimation of high-demand areas due to insufficient past provision.
\end{itemize}