61 lines
2.5 KiB
TeX
61 lines
2.5 KiB
TeX
%图
|
||
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||
\centering
|
||
\includegraphics[width=12cm]{flowchartmodel1.png}
|
||
\caption{}
|
||
\label{}
|
||
\end{figure}
|
||
|
||
%表
|
||
|
||
\begin{table}[H]\small
|
||
\centering
|
||
\caption{Truncation Correction for Key High-Demand Sites}
|
||
\label{tab:truncation_correction}
|
||
\begin{tabular}{lcccc}
|
||
\toprule
|
||
Site Name & $\mu$ & $p_{trunc}$&$\tilde{\mu}$ & Correction Magnitude \\
|
||
\midrule
|
||
MFP Waverly & 396.6 & 81.57\% & 429.0 & +8.2\% \\
|
||
MFP Avoca & 314.6 & 26.84\% & 323.0 & +2.7\% \\
|
||
MFP Endwell United Methodist & 285.3 & 14.34\% & 289.3 & +1.4\% \\
|
||
MFP College TC3 - College & 261.5 & 16.80\% & 265.9 & +1.7\% \\
|
||
MFP Redeemer Lutheran Church & 230.6 & 10.07\% & 232.9 & +1.0\% \\
|
||
\bottomrule
|
||
\end{tabular}
|
||
\end{table}
|
||
|
||
%有颜色的表
|
||
|
||
|
||
\begin{table}[H]
|
||
\small
|
||
\centering
|
||
\caption{Performance Comparison of Different Allocation Schemes }
|
||
\label{tab:allocation_performance}
|
||
% 缩放至单栏宽度，保留1em内边距避免贴边
|
||
\resizebox{\dimexpr\linewidth-1em\relax}{!}{
|
||
\begin{tabular}{lllll}
|
||
\toprule[1pt] % 加粗顶线
|
||
\rowcolor{white} % 表头底色为白
|
||
Allocation Scheme & E1 & E2& F1$\downarrow$ & F2 $\uparrow$\\
|
||
\midrule[0.6pt]
|
||
\rowcolor{recommendColor} % 推荐方案浅蓝底色
|
||
Recommended Scheme ($\tilde{\mu}$ Proportional) & 139,469 & 131,462 & 0.314 & 2.00 \\
|
||
\rowcolor{baselineColor} % 基线方案浅灰底色
|
||
Baseline 1: Uniform Allocation & 104,797 & 101,309 & 0.024 & 9.25 \\
|
||
\rowcolor{baselineColor}
|
||
Baseline 2: 2019 Historical Scaling & 104,071 & 100,264 & 0.091 & 5.00 \\
|
||
\rowcolor{baselineColor}
|
||
Baseline 3: Raw Demand Proportion (Raw $\mu$) & 139,129 & 131,397 & 0.313 & 2.00 \\
|
||
\bottomrule[1pt] % 加粗底线
|
||
\end{tabular}
|
||
}
|
||
\end{table}
|
||
|
||
%点
|
||
|
||
\begin{itemize}
|
||
\item \textbf{Survivorship Bias in Observed Data}: The table and Figure \ref{Truncation Correction for High-Demand Sites} reveal "survivorship bias" in observed data. For MFP Waverly, its 81.57\% truncation probability means the site operated nearly permanently at full capacity historically—its observed mean reflects capacity limits, not the ceiling of true demand.
|
||
\item \textbf{Significance of Correction}: Via the truncated normal model, the site’s potential demand is adjusted upward to 429.0. This ensures resource allocation is based on "actual community needs" , resolving the underestimation of high-demand areas due to insufficient past provision.
|
||
\end{itemize} |